Central Government Control

 

Dictators love a government with a central government, it easy to overthrow and control the populace.  All authority is consolidated in a central location and easy to manage.  Get a few cronies’ together and give the government a good heave ho and the dictator are in control. 

 

               The United States is about at that point.  A few large major corporations, control about 30-40% of the economy.  The government controls about 20-30& of the remaining economy with the health act and the federal bureaucracy. 

 

               A wannabe ruler would have a pretty easy time overthrowing the US government.  Get a few of the large corporations on board, use the Patriot Act and the bureaucrats on their side and there it is.  A new style of government is put in place and there is group of controlling elites operating behind a dictator. 

 

               To see parallels, look south of the border.  The government of Mexico controls the major companies there and they dictate how the economy operates.  The ruling Mexican Party has been power for decades.  There is an opposition party, but they haven’t had a president from their party in years.  This gives the illusion that Mexico is a democracy. 

 

               There has been a mind set of lately, that bigger is better.   As a result just a few control different phases of the US economy.  Right now, Big Tech, the silicon valley, is under scrutiny because of their control of social media and other electronic avenues.   This is a good example of how a few can manipulate the many. 

 

               So is this what’s going on with inflation, a few large corporations are pushing huge price increases.    Look at how few there marketing petroleum, these people control the price of gas.  Same is true in the food industry.  There are about a dozen giants marketing food and the control around 60% of the market. 

 

               So if you want to overthrow a government, consolidate your bureaucracy and get some large corporate cronies. 

 

The mindset of bigger is better, works in favor of tyrants that want power and control.  This is one of the reasons, the Constitution, gives us separation of powers.  To keep one government entity from telling another how to conduct their business. 

 

Yet this is happening in Colorado, with the state telling the school districts how to conduct their operation.  A school district is a separate government entity.  They have elected board members and have taxing authority.  The state sets accreditation standards for the schools.  The state provides standards for teacher guidelines and a teachers college.  The state is not to interfere in the daily operation of a school district.  A school and other government is supposed to be protected by the constitution from interference from another government entity.  Criminal activity is another matter. 

 

               By telling the schools they can not have certain type of mascot, they state has went outside its authority.   Yet if you want power and control over others, power is consolidated by telling others how to behave.  Eventually the lines of separation are blurred and the other entities disappear.  Then one point of authority is in power. 

 

               There supposed to be limits on what various government entities can do.  We don’t stop the politicians, we vote for, nor does the judicial branch always follow the constitution.  Over the years, our politicians have sacrificed for freedom in the name of safety.  Freedoms lost are hard to win back.  We need members of the legislature that can and are willing to swimn up stream and begin repealing lots of the laws that are supposed to provide safety for us. 

 

Look at the no smoking laws.  Government is telling the property owner how to conduct business.   It is no longer the choice of the owner, but the government’s choice.  Because a few few wanted it safe, in their perception, the many were punished to keep the few happy.  The few used the bully pulpit of the government to impose their will on others.  Look at all of the other laws that have been imposed, resulting in the loos of freedom of choices. 

Sad Sack Farmer

 

 

Joe had been a farmer all his life, growing up on Grappa’s helper.  Joe learned to care for the land, for it was the source of the family livelihood. 

 

So when the electric pickups came out, Joe bought one, because he had heard it was good for the environment. 

 

The following year, electric tractors became avail be for farming.  Joe knew he had to have on to help the environment.  That winter, Joe went to the big city to look at the new electric tractors.  It was just over 250 mile trip to the city. Looking at the tractors, Joe decided which model he wanted. 

 

Going into the office, Joe filled out and signed all the paperwork.  The dealer said they would deliver the new tractor the following week.  All excited, Joe gets into his electric pick up for the trip home. 

 

Out on the road, Joe is as happy as can be.  It was a clear day, not a cloud overhead and the road is clear.  About two thirds of the way home, the pickup quit.  Looking at the charge meter, Joe saw he had run out of electricity. 

 

Coasting to the side of the road and on the shoulder, Joe parked.  Getting out, Joe climbed into the back of the pickup and uncovered the generator.  He gets the pickup plugged into the generator.  Gets in the pickup and lights up a cigarette to smoke while waiting for his electric truck to charge up. 

 

Finally, late that night Joe gets home with his charged up electric pick up.  Next morning as he was sitting at the table have coffee, a smile was pasted on Joe’s face.  His wife glances across the table at the big kid grin and smile’s back.  She says, “ Ya know, you’re going to have to get a bigger generator to keep the tractor charged up.”  Joe looks at, nods his, and tips the coffee cup back. 

 

Delivery day arrives and Joe’s chest is so big, it almost explodes.  Local paper folks had been told about the big day and were lined up in the yard. 

 

The semi rolls up and parks.  They proceed to unload the electric tractor, cameras were clicking and voices were abuzz.  Soon the tractor was parked in front of its new home and Joe’s face was beaming.  He was answering questions and pictures were being taken. 

 

With spring approaching Joe was itchy to try his new electric tractor in the field. Warm weather was rolling over the land and Joe had prepped his plow and off to the filed Joe and equipment went. 

 

Driving into the field, Joe set the plow in and began plowing.  Down the row Joe went, Tractor easing actors the dirt, Turing up fresh pled dirt.  Joe was so happy, but the ground was not ready yet.  At the end of the field, Joe stopped and parked for the day.  Getting in pickup, Joe went home.  

 

Couple days later, Joe returned to the field and got in his tractor to start plowing again.  Down the field they went, fresh dirt being turned and Joe sat there watching his daily program on TV.  After a few hours, Joe was startled out o his reverie as alarms and light galore went off.  Charge in the batteries was almost gone.  Joe was turning red as the electric tractor limped down to the end of the field. 

 

The charge was almost gone.  Joe gets into his pick up to go home and get the charger he had just bought.  Pulling out of the field, the yellow battery light came on is his pick up.  The battery charge in the pickup was almost gone.  Hoping he could get home, Joe and pick up rolled on.  About a half mile short of home the red light came on and Joe coasted to a stop on the edge of the road.  Joe gets his phone out and calls his wife and tells her what has happened.. 

 

The wife looks out the window and sees Joe walking towards the house.  Putting her work aside, the wife heads out to the shed to start the old utility tractor.  As she is backing out, Joe cams walking in and jumps on the tractor besides her. 

 

Out onto the road they turn and off to hook up to the pickup.  They get the pickup home and parked by its charging station.  Joe thanks his wife and gives her a hug.  Jumping on the tractor, he backs into the shed to hook up the new diesel generator.  Off to the field Joe heads to charge up his new electric tractor. 

 

warming not so much

 

Conspiracies of the EPA?

 

Looking at the means, sometimes wonder is the process is good or contrary.   So I question the process and means of the EPA. 

 

Back in the late 60’s and early 70’s, there were serious pollution problems.  So the government formed the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, to help with America’s pollution problems.  This new agency was charged with cleaning up the air, water and ground.  Pollution standards were set and America began the process of being cleaned up.

 

At the same time the pollution cleaning began another alarm was sounded.  Global warming, was the new threat to the world and excess carbon in the air was the culprit, known as greenhouse gas.  The internal combustion engine was blamed for the major source of greenhouse gasses along with power plants. 

 

At the end of the 70’s the land was clearing up.  Cleaner air and water.  Through the 80’s, most polluting sources were gone.  The power plants were 99%+ clean and so was the internal combustion engine. 

 

*****

 

I bought a used heavy duty pick up for local deliveries.  It was a diesel, 1984, almost no black smoke from the diesel and it 35MPG around the city.  Years later, I ran across a similar Pick Up, same specifications but it now got 8mpg. 

 

So the question is…. Is it cleaner then my old truck?

 

Things to keep in mind:  laws of physics, matter can not be created or destroyed.  So a gallon of fuel will contain X amount of carbon.  This can not change. 

 

So my old pick up, every 35 miles would emit X amount of carbon.  The newer version would emit 4.1X parts of carbon.  So with new standards, the EPA is forcing the internal combustion engine to produce more carbon. Yet Carbon is blamed for causing global warming/climate change.

 

So it would appear that the EPA is forcing climate change/global warming. 

 

Across the board, the EPA has reduced the production capacity of the internal combustion engine to produce excessive amounts of carbon. 

In conclusion; who is the EPA trying to protect?

 

Is the EPA in conspiracy with the climate changers?